Responding To Bob Again : IEC (4)
Context : b o b • j o t s - Islamic Economic Policy? :
Dear Bob,
To save your bandwidth I propose that we can discuss by email or the unmoderated Usenet newsgroups (alt.religion.islam or alt.religion.christian.biblestudy). Email is private, while Usenet is publically archived at ftp.jaring.my. To access Usenet, you need a NEWS server, and news.jaring.my is a good starter as it is free for JARING members. Otherwise, head to Newsguy.com but you got to subscribe. Both these two Usenet newsgroups are UNMODERATED meaning they are uncensored and you can post freely anything you like.
I sent this to you by email, so I hope you will reply the same way. You know my email already.
In the meantime, you claim I do not know the meaning of “anarchist” but you too do not know the meaning of “conservative”. In one discussion with Rajan Rishyakaran on your blog, you claimed Western “conservative” parties (like Christian Democratic parties) were similar to PAS! This is ridiculous as Western English is not same as Eastern English. After all, when a language becomes international, same words mean something else to different peoples. PAS may be “conservative” by Malaysian English but not by Western English as Western understanding of “conservative” means a conservative foreign policy (normally pro-Israel and against giving donations to what the left calls “poor” countries).
In Malaysia, as I see it, most of the opposition parties are
“anarchists” (meaning in Malaysian English, they have nothing but anti-establishment and anti-government sentiment. They do not have any clear ideology to rule Malaysia by themselves.
“Dude .. first you called me an Islamist .. then a stooge of Islam .. now an anarchist? Which brand of anarchism am I allegedly an adherent of? Do you even know what anarchism is? Perhaps you’d care to explain? In your own hosted infrastructure, of course.”
Yes, you are an Islamist because you are a stooge for Islam. As the RSV translation of the Bible says in the verse Mark 9:40 :
“For he that is not against us is for us.”
So, you have just two choices: FOR US (i.e. For the Lord and His people) or AGAINST US (i.e. Against the Lord and His people). Yes, only two choices. If you support Islam, you are a stooge no doubt, and WHAT IS A STOOGE? Yes, a follower. Take me. I am a stooge for Christianity as I am very pro-Christian. So, indeed, I am right to say you are an Islamist. If you cannot understand my English, what can I do? Jesus too spoke The Truth but many of the Pharisees and the Saducees refused to follow his way and prefered the false way.
Now, I called you An Anarchist no doubt. This is because you want too much freedom, including the freedom to deceive. If you do not want to follow Christianity as enshrined by the 7 Ecumenical Councils of the Roman Empire, why call yourself a Christian? Freedom of religion is not the same as freedom of sect or freedom of cult. Russia bans Jehovah’s Witnesses and Germany bans the Church of Scientology, both, which are legal in the USA. If someone created a new religion that worshipped Buddha but called it Christianity, will this be freedom of religion? Hardly in my eyes. Its fraud. But this fraud is legal in the USA and not Russia.
If you are a honest person, Bob, please admit publically you are an Islamist who wants arnarchy in non-Muslim lands so, non-Muslims will be divided into sects and will be confused, yet Muslims will be one United Ummah. We cannot be MANY “Churches” as every “Church” on this planet is a sect, except the One, Holy, and Apostolic Church of Christ.
Have a nice day.
Gary.
P/S: Keadilan was founded just based on the belief of Anwar must be in power, must have political leadership, and hate towards non-Muslims who oppose Muslim supremacy.
